Demystifying the decision intelligence product ecosystem đ
An easy to read introduction to the decision intelligence product ecosystem
Hello friends and welcome to the first article of Signal to Product!
This time, weâll start from the ground up and clarify the main terminology that defines the decision intelligence product ecosystem.
Introduction - What does the umbrella term âDecision Intelligence Productsâ mean?
The decision intelligence product ecosystem is vast and contains a few sub-categories. This article aims to help you better understand what is included in this ecosystem and what is not.
Letâs start with a wider definition of the ecosystem as a whole.
Decision Intelligence Products are tools or solutions that span the entire journey from raw data to actionable insights, empowering humans to make informed, strategic decisions. They include three main categories:
Data products (e.g. APIs, data catalogs, etc.)
Information products (e.g. dashboards, reports, etc.)
Insight products (e.g. predictive alerts, and dynamics recommendations)
These products work together to provide clarity, context, and guidance to decision-makers.
In addition to the three categories that can be considered the ecosystem's outputs, we can mention one more part of the ecosystem -  developer tools (e.g., Tableau, Python, Power BI, etc.). We can consider them the enablers and infrastructure of decision intelligence products, the tools needed to develop them.
Whatâs not included in the decision intelligence product ecosystem?
Data products can often be fed into autonomous machines that make decisions independently, whether based on hard-coded rules or AI algorithms. Waymoâs self-driving taxis are an example of such machines, but they are not included in decision intelligence products.Â
I draw the boundaries of the decision intelligence product ecosystem around solutions that help humans make decisions. Any solution geared towards machines making autonomous decisions without a human in the loop is out of this scope.
Also, decision intelligence products are geared towards gathering information for the sake of making decisions (aka âepistemic actionsâ) instead of solutions geared towards practical actions. For instance, you are 100% able to check the prices of products in an online clothing store, but I wouldnât include online stores in this category because their main purpose is to make you buy products.
Take a look at the diagram of the decision intelligence product ecosystem that sums it all up:
Now letâs talk about each product category individually.

Data Products
A data product is designed to provide data as the core output to enable human-led analyses and the creation of digital services. These products are often infrastructure-focused and help technological systems or humans access, manage, or manipulate data.
In short, think about raw data that can be used for many different purposes.
Data productsâ main characteristics are:
Raw or semi-processed data: The product delivers data directly or provides a way to interact with it
Built for human or non-human data consumers: These consumers could be humans (e.g. data analysts, software application developers, etc.) or systems (like machine learning models)
Industry examples of data products
Datasets - Some notable examples in this category include the World Bank Open Data collection, and Googleâs collection of computer science open datasets. You can literally take these data sets as is, and perform your own analyses
Applications Programming Interfaces (APIs) - Some interesting examples in this category include Finhub.io for real-time stock and crypto prices API, AccuWeatherâs weather report API, and Moovitâs public transit API. All of these can be fed into the creation of information products for humans and more complex digital products. If you want to know more about how APIs work, check out this great post from PM Skills Weekly
Data pipelines - Processes that collect and transform data (e.g. providing additional input, data enrichment, etc.). An example could be taking a customerâs credit card transaction and assigning a spending category, a service thatâs provided to many international banks by companies such as Personetics to enable things such as cross and upselling financial products and services to their customers
Now letâs explore the next level up - Information products

Information Products
An information product is designed to provide easy access to information for humans who need to make decisions in various contexts (e.g., drivers driving from point A to point B, business owners deciding whether to purchase additional stock, etc.). Information products focus on delivering information derived from raw data in a structured, actionable, and often user-friendly format.Â
In short, think about the types of screens that show trends and real-time information.
Information productsâ main characteristics are:
Derived from raw data: An information product is built on top of raw or processed data but focuses on interpretation
The purpose is decision-making: Information products are aimed at providing humans with information they can act on
Industry examples of information products
Interactive dashboards - There are many examples, and the ones that probably come to mind for many of us are Google Analytics, and company KPI dashboards for different members of the C-level managers that involve charts and graphs. The dashboard is a design element thatâs used in many instances and weâll touch upon it in future articles
Interactive maps help us make decisions based on spatial information. Many of us can think of Google and Apple maps, Waze, and more specialized maps such as Flighradar24 for airplane movements and MarineTraffic for ship movements
Static reportsâThese can be ad-hoc or periodic. For instance, you might receive a weekly exercise report from Fitbit or Google Fit or an ad hoc report about consumers or companies in country X generated by companies such as Mintel, Gartner, etc.
Content databases and information repositories - They could be internal or external to an organization. Think of a public libraryâs database, or an internal marketing content library thatâs owned by a company and sits on platforms such as Bloomfire.
Market intelligence platforms - Interactive platforms that sometimes combine some of the elements mentioned before to give you a comprehensive solution to learn about a specific industry. Examples can be Fathom4sight, iSky Research, 11:FS Pulse in the fintech space, and Quantumrun for trends across various industries.
Letâs explore the next level up - Insight products.

Insight Products
Insight products are the final step in the decision intelligence value chain. They focus on providing specific, actionable guidance rather than leaving the user to interpret information. They tend to be embedded within a larger information product (or just a digital product) and trigger insights and alerts dynamically.
In short, think of the alert you get on Google Maps when youâre already on your way and it wants to suggest a short driving route for you.
Insight Productsâ main characteristics are:
Directly Actionable: They donât just explain whatâs happening or what has already happened but suggest what to do next
Often Predictive or Prescriptive: Insights are frequently derived from advanced analytics or machine learning models
Contextually tailored to Usersâ Needs: Insights are highly contextual and often designed for a specific decision-maker or operational process and are triggered dynamically
Industry examples of insight products
Dynamic route suggestions on GPS applications such as Waze, and Google Maps
Location intelligence - Companies such as Local Logic and First Street offer these insights as a service to real-estate companies and embed them on websites such as Zillow (see the photo above)
Personal financial management - A larger group of banks offers dynamic insights about their spending habits and more to their clients. A few examples from the Canadian market where Iâm based are RBCâs NOMIÂ and Desjardinsâ Alvie
AI-generated highlighted summaries - In the age of generative AI, some solutions involve AI-generated summaries that give you the main insights from various sources. Examples can be Google Gemini search highlights, or Dscoutâs AI function that helps user researchers summarize insights fast
The decision intelligence value chain
Another way to think about the three types of decision intelligence products is to view them as a value chain. Letâs break it down for you:
Data Products: Provide the raw materials (data infrastructure, APIs, pipelines) and enable the creation of products in the next two levels - Information and insights products
Information Products: Take raw data and transform it so you can get the full context and see trends and patterns (e.g. dashboards, interactive maps)
Insight Products: Deliver actionable guidance and recommendations (e.g. predictive models, hard-coded and AI-based recommendations)
Take a look at this graph that explains how these products differ in terms of value and complexity:
Value - How much value a user can derive from each type of product. Itâs easier to take action on a recommendation generated by an insight product as opposed to using a large dataset produced by a government that requires a lot of processing
Complexity - The level of complexity needed to develop a product in each category. Itâs easy to release a dataset, but much more complicated to develop a dashboard with data visualizations, and itâs even much harder to develop machine learning models and insight products.
Conclusion: Final Words
If youâve made it to the end then I hope I gave you some food for thought about the different ways you can look at the decision intelligence produce ecosystem. I know itâs a lot of information and it might take a bit of time to digest.
Those of us who work on any of the three types of products can better understand in what category their product falls. Itâs important to mention that in some cases, a product can play in more than one category as some companies offer an information or insight product, as well as an API that developers can use to develop even more applications and digital products.
In the next article, Iâll explore some of the additional characteristics that define decision intelligence products. This will help you better understand their different forms and shapes.
In the meantime, Iâd love to hear your thoughts and comments on this article.
If you know anyone who works on decision intelligence products or is interested in this space, invite them to subscribe to Signal to Product at this link (signaltoproduct.substack.com) or share this post with them.
If a friend sent it to you and youâd like to learn more about this fascinating space of decision intelligence products subscribe for free to Signal to Product now to get my articles, case studies, and more directly to your inbox.
ŠYaron Cohen - 2025
Hi Yaron, I can see that we have similar interests. I just subscribed to you đ¤
Howdy Hey, Yaron,
Hope you are well and thank you for this thought-provoking article. The article helped elucidate one of the biggest issues I have with using generative AI tools, which is not too say I am anti-AI. All tools have their place when used with purpose for the right scenario, knowing their limitations.
The issue (for me of course), is as an information or insight tool, generative AI tools like ChatGPT, creates an illusion of magic! I had never experienced this before AI was readily available. I don't like to blindly just believe a statistic/information/insight, but before AI in most cases there was some reference, even if not always obvious for discovering where did the statistic/information/insight come from. In other words, it was at least possible to be the creator of the information/insight product by getting your hands on the raw data, likely using a developer tool like Tableau. Same in a meeting at work, you could not just say the insight and expect others to believe without providing support for how you knew it, you often presented with the information product (eg a dashboard as it implied there existed raw data behind each representation). Heck, same with going all the way back to grade school where 'show your work' in Math class (as annoying as it was sometimes), was a necessary skill to learn for later on in life to build credibility for any argument. Yes, I get that the raw data exists across the internet, but for any one output from a generative AI tool tool it is not necessarily possible to say hey please spit out all references used for that output, so that I could critique whether I agree with the insights or not. I just tried it with ChatGPT and they give you the following response:
{
Prompt: what is the secret to a perfect cup of coffee?
Response: long description
Prompt: show me your references
Response:
I donât pull from a single set of references like a book or website, but rather generate responses based on a mix of expert knowledge, coffee science, and best practices from baristas, roasters, and coffee enthusiasts. If you're looking for specific sources, I can recommend some great references like: (they listed a bunch of examples, which we don't know how they were used or if they were used for the output)
}
Thus, and not that you were even talking about generative AI, but the question that comes to mind: Are generative AI tools real information or insight tools if they cannot accurately support their outputs? Or are the something between them and magic? Magic I would find hard to respect as an insight or information tool.
Although I agree with your value chain, based on increased ease to consume/use the outputs for action and increased complexity to replicate, for me the value chain would be diagramed differently to reflect the need for each preceding one, or at least their outputs to create the next (sort of an abstract sense of a product). For example, even though an information product might not exist it does not mean that information from data was not created to get the insights, or that someone did not create a product to serve that need.
Although, I don't want to get caught up in an argument about whether the infographic is accurate or not, as that would be pointless since it is impossible to draw the perfect infographic. Below are a few alternatives that came to mind after thinking through the above arguments:
- Cyclical to exemplify a flow of use potentially by multiple people, or a single person serving multiple roles. For example developers>data scientists>designers.
- A triangle with developer products at the bottom (i.e. foundation) and insight products at the top. This would demonstrate that an insight product is only as good as the information and cleaned data, and the products used to output them.
- A web of positive/negative feedback and feedforward loops to demonstrate the flow of information regardless of the presence of a product in the traditional sense or not.
Thank you again for the article, very clear in plain English and insightful, and for providing your references as excellent examples!
Have an amazing day!